IPEM Application Process

Essay Scoring Criteria For State Employees

Group 1a. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st approach clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the level of success for the 1st approach clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was a 2nd approach clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the level of success for the 2nd approach clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was a 3rd approach clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the level of success for the 3rd approach clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 1b. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st type of assistance clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st type of assistance clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd type of assistance clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd type of assistance clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd type of assistance clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd type of assistance clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 1c. 70% = 38 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st planning conference clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st planning conference clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd planning conference clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd planning conference clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd planning conference clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd planning conference clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 4th planning conference clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 4th planning conference clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 5th planning conference clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 5th planning conference clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 2a. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st function clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st function clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd function clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd function clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd function clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd function clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 2b. 70% = 14 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the most recent disaster response clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the involvement clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Were the lessons learned cleared described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 2c. 70% = 14 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Were the specific tasks clearly listed?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Were the specific tasks clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the process to complete these tasks clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 3a. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st reason clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st reason clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd reason clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd reason clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd reason clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd reason clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 3b. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st power clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the impact of the 1st power clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd power clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the impact of the 2nd power clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd power clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the impact of the 3rd power clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 3c. 70% = 17 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the state legislation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the impact of the state legislation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the federal legislation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the impact of the federal legislation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 4a. 70% = 31 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st advantage clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st advantage clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd advantage clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd advantage clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st limitation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st limitation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd limitation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd limitation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 4b. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st activity clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st activity clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd activity clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd activity clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd activity clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd activity clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 4c. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st situation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st situation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd situation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd situation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd situation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd situation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5