IPEM Application Process

Essay Scoring Criteria For Non-State Employees

Group 1a. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st approach clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the level of success for the 1st approach clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was a 2nd approach clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the level of success for the 2nd approach clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was a 3rd approach clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the level of success for the 3rd approach clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 1b. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st type of assistance clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st type of assistance clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd type of assistance clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd type of assistance clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd type of assistance clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd type of assistance clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 1c. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st task clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st task clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd task clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd task clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd task clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd task clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 1d. 70% = 21 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the EOC clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the EOC clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the most recent EOC activation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the most recent EOC activation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Were the actions implemented clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 2a. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st function clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st function clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd function clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd function clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd function clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd function clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 2b. 70% = 17 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the hazard analysis process clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the level of success clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Were the jurisdictional partners clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the jurisdictional partners level of involvement clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 2c. 70% = 38 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st phase clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the jurisdiction's approach to the 1st phase clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd phase clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the jurisdiction's approach to the 2nd phase clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd phase clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the jurisdiction's approach to the 3rd phase clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 4th phase clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the jurisdiction's approach to the 4th phase clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 5th phase clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the jurisdiction's approach to the 5th phase clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 2d. 70% = 17 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the EOP development/revision process clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the level of success clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Were the jurisdictional partners clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the jurisdictional partners level of involvement clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 3a. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st reason clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st reason clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd reason clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd reason clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd reason clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd reason clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 3b. 70% = 14 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the requested document clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Were the emergency powers clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the position that each power is available to clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 3c. 70% = 17 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the state legislation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the impact of the state legislation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the federal legislation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the impact of the federal legislation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 3d. 70% = 38 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st planning conference clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st planning conference clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd planning conference clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd planning conference clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd planning conference clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd planning conference clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 4th planning conference clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 4th planning conference clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 5th planning conference clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 5th planning conference clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 4a. 70% = 31 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st advantage clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st advantage clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd advantage clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd advantage clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st limitation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st limitation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd limitation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd limitation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 4b. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st activity clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st activity clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd activity clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd activity clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd activity clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd activity clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 4c. 70% = 14 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Were all pre-established MOUs identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Were all temporary/permanent debris sites identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the debris reduction process clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Group 4d. 70% = 24 points
Overall Neatness/Grammar/Spelling	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st situation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 1st situation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd situation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 2nd situation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd situation clearly identified?	0	1	2	3	4	5
Was the 3rd situation clearly described?	0	1	2	3	4	5